The War of Curzola (1294–9)

By MSW Add a Comment 15 Min Read
The War of Curzola 1294–9

Veduta di Genova nell’anno 1481 (‘View of Genoa in the year 1481’) by
sixteenth-century Genoese painter Cristoforo Grassi, depicting a parade of
carracks and galleys in port.

Battle of Curzola in 1298

The truce of 1269 was renewed
several times and a chary coexistence between the two mercantile maritime
powers persisted in the eastern Mediterranean for more than twenty years. What
finally fractured the peace was precipitated by neither Venice nor Genoa, but
by the Mamluks of Egypt. Their conquest of Acre in 1291 contracted the trading
environment available to western merchants in the East and sharply elevated
competition for what was left. The Venetians, who had lost their substantial
quarter in Acre, grew increasingly more resentful of the Genoese presence in
the region. An incident in July 1293 amply revealed the sub rosa animosity
between the two. Near Coron a small Venetian squadron of four galleys by chance
came upon seven Genoese merchant galleys returning from ‘Romania’. Instead of
giving way, the Venetians attacked, resulting in the capture of all their
vessels.

The next confrontation would not
be by accident. The loss of Acre to Christianity meant that trading posts in
Cyprus, especially Famagusta, and in Armenia, specifically the Cilician port of
Lajazzo (modern Ayas in Turkey) were all the more vital. And the Venetians
wanted these entrepôts for themselves. In 1294 they sent at least fourteen war
galleys (possibly as many as twenty-five) under Marco Basegio with the annual
caravan to Famagusta and Lajazzo in the apparent hope of duplicating their
success in the War of San Sabas thirty-six years earlier. They first raided the
Genoese enclave in Limassol, but this served to alert the Genoese of Pera, who
quickly armed a flotilla of merchant galleys under the command of Niccolò
Spinola. The latter caught the Venetians off Lajazzo with their sails up,
ill-prepared for battle, and scored an impressive victory. The Genoese easily
outmanoeuvred the Venetian vessels, driving into many of them amidships. They
seized nearly all of them.

This last clash signalled all-out
war and spurred Genoa to a mammoth mobilization. The Genoese chronicler Iacopo
Varagine claimed that the commune’s Credenza (war council) produced a fleet of
165 galleys, mostly triremes with crews of 220 to 300, amounting to around
45,000 men. Lesser estimates put the total crew complement at about 35,000,
which was still, in the words of John Dotson, ‘the population equivalent of a
substantial medieval city’. In an ostentatious display of logistical execution,
the Genoese actually launched this gargantuan task force in August 1295 under
Oberto Doria, the hero of Meloria, daring the Venetians to challenge it. They
even went so far as to deploy it to Messina to make the meeting easier. However
proud of their prowess at sea the Venetians may have been, they were not
arrogant fools. They declined the offer, leaving the Genoese to return home,
their blood-lust unsated.

Instead, in July of the following
year the Venetians charged Ruggiero Morosini (nicknamed ‘Malabranca’, meaning
‘Evil Claw’) with conducting an armada of around seventy galleys on a raid of
Pera. He not only left the Genoese colony in ashes, but also sank what merchant
vessels he could find in the Golden Horn. Morosini later plundered Phocaea, a
port on the west coast of Asia Minor owned at the time by the Genoese nobleman
Benedetto Zaccaria, famed for his role in the Battle of Meloria. Thereafter,
the Venetian admiral detached a squadron under Giovanni Soranzo which then
proceeded into the Black Sea to prey on Genoese shipping and ravage the Genoese
colony at Caffa (present-day Feodosiya) on the coast of Crimea. Nor did La
Serenissima neglect Oltremare. Nine galleys were also dispatched under Frosio
Morosini to pillage Genoese possessions on Cyprus and at Lajazzo. The Venetians
had quite evidently learned the value of waging the guerre de course.

The Genoese had finally recovered
enough from the rigours of amassing Oberto Doria’s massive armada of 1295 to
attempt some measure of retribution in 1297. They sent a sizeable fleet of
eighty war galleys into the Adriatic to wreak havoc on Venetian shipping and
coastal properties, but they made the mistake of placing it under the split
command of two admirals who reviled each other: Gando de Mari and Tommaso
Spinola. They lingered in the area until their biscotti ran low, hoping in vain
to engage the main Venetian fleet. It was then that the two had their
predictable falling-out. Spinola wanted to remain longer; De Mari did not. The
latter took fifty galleys and departed for Sardinia; Spinola stayed with the
remaining thirty galleys until the Venetian admiral Andrea Dandolo chased him
back to Sicily and beyond with an estimated eighty-two galleys. The Genoese
would attempt to penetrate the Adriatic again the next year, but this time it
would be under the unified command of Lamba Doria, the younger brother of
Oberto Doria, and the results would be very different.

The particulars of the Battle of
Curzola remain clouded by a crowd of conflicting accounts, the principal one of
which is an epic poem by an anonymous Genoese author whose expressed purpose
was to extol the exploits of his compatriots. There are, however, some common
elements from which a general picture emerges. Late in the summer of 1298,
after a brief stop at Messina, Lamba Doria led his eighty-five or so galleys
into the Strait of Otranto. There a fateful storm scattered his armada and he
ended up seeking shelter at the port of Antivari (present-day Bar in
Montenegro) with about twenty of his ships. Around fifty-seven ships joined him
the next day, but at least eight remained unaccounted for. These would later
prove crucial, but for the moment Doria decided to proceed north along the
Dalmatian coast, pillaging Venetian possessions as he went. By the end of
August his fleet of about seventy-seven galleys had made it as far as the
island of Curzola (modern Korcûla off the coast of Croatia). There, in an
apparent attempt to draw the Venetian fleet out for battle, the Genoese
ruthlessly ravaged the Venetian-ruled town of the same name on the east end of
the island.

If that was their plan, it worked.
When word reached the Rialto, the Venetians hastily collected a fleet, calling
on Chioggia and their colonies all along the Dalmatian coast to supply ships.
Even Marco Polo, believed to be a native of Curzola, provided a galley on which
he personally served as captain. In all, ninety-five galleys and three navi
were gathered under the overall command of Captain General Andrea Dandolo, the
son of the former Doge Giovanni Dandolo. Manning such an armada so quickly
proved a daunting challenge and must have resulted in crews below the calibre
of those who normally served onboard Venice’s vessels. Manfroni went so far as
to term them ‘a tumultuous collection of improvised crews’. But the size of
this fleet made Dandolo overconfident: he ordered Maffeo Quirini, on patrol in
the Adriatic with thirteen galleys, to return to Venice because he would not
need his ships.

Dandolo’s armada found the Genoese
on Saturday, 6 September at the east end of the narrow channel between the
island of Curzola and the peninsula of Sabbioncello (Pelješac) jutting
northwestwards off the Dalmatian mainland. Lamba Doria immediately ordered his
galleys to link together in a line across the strait (about 1,600m or a mile
wide abeam the town of Korcûla) and moor with their bows facing northwest
towards the Venetians, presumably with the south flank anchored on the town of
Curzola, which the Genoese had occupied. But he made no effort to engage. It
was sunset and the onset of darkness rendered combat impracticable. So the two
fleets sat warily watching each other through the night. Some Venetian sources
even reported that Doria, daunted by Dandolo’s enormous armada, sought terms,
but this has been discounted by most modern historians. If it happened at all,
the Genoese naval commander was probably just playing for time in the hope that
his straggling galleys would arrive in time. In any event, Dandolo not only
rejected the overtures, but dispatched the famed corsair Domenico Schiavo in a
columbet (a sort of small scout ship) to ensure that the Genoese did not
attempt to abscond in the night.

On Sunday morning, 7 September
1298, the Venetians advanced amid the usual missile exchange. Details are
scant, but Dandolo was said to have formed his fleet into a semi-circle with
the apparent intention of enveloping the smaller Genoese force, particularly
the exposed north flank. Doria therefore detached a squadron of eight to ten
galleys to counter the encircling wing. It was repulsed, but when the Genoese
galleys withdrew back into their line, several Venetian galleys evidently gave
chase and the formation’s integrity broke down. ‘Thus, the Venetians ended up
in the midst of the Genoese,’ reported the ‘Templar of Tyre’. At this point it
seems Doria had his ships sever their anchor hawsers and bridling cables in
order to manoeuvre at will. The Genoese may have had the advantage here:
contemporary reports suggest that their galleys were larger, better equipped
and more manoeuvrable. For instance, they were probably employing the highly
efficient terzaruolo (three oarsmen per bench) rowing system and they almost
certainly enjoyed the more responsive sternpost-mounted rudders. Many must have
been triremes with crews one and half times the size of the Venetian biremes.
In any event, the battle seems to have degenerated into a bloody free-for-all.
Doria’s own son Octaviano was mortally wounded with a crossbow bolt. Legend has
it that Doria had his son’s corpse dumped over the side in mid-combat on the
premise that there could have been no more fitting interment. The contest was
decided at the eleventh hour by the unexpected arrival of the missing eight or
so Genoese galleys. These attacked one of the nearly exhausted Venetian flanks,
causing its collapse.

It would be the largest battle the
Venetians would ever fight against their Ligurian adversaries. It would also be
their worst defeat. Of the ninety-six galleys that took part, perhaps only a
dozen made it back to Venice, commanded by the resourceful Domenico Schiavo.
Over 7,000 men perished. Estimates of those captured range from 8,000 all the
way up to 16,000, including Andrea Dandolo himself. Reports of his ultimate
fate vary, but the most oft-repeated version is that he killed himself by
intentionally bashing his head against the rower’s bench to which he had been
chained. One man who survived, of course, was Marco Polo, who was transported
back to a Genoese gaol, where he would dictate his famous Travels to the Pisan,
Rustichello. The victory clearly belonged to the Genoese, but it was a Pyrrhic
one. Although La Serenissima had been rendered virtually defenceless by the
annihilation of its armada, Lamba Doria found he was unable to press the
advantage. ‘It seems that his losses, including deaths and injuries, exceeded
those of the Venetians,’ surmised Manfroni. Doria instead burned all the
captured galleys (presumably because he did not possess the manpower to crew
them) and returned to Genoa to a muted homecoming.

Domenico Schiavo attempted to
salvage some measure of Venetian pride the next year by leading a raid on Genoa
itself. He seized some merchantmen and planted the flag of St Mark on the
port’s mole (breakwater), but the war had in reality run its course. Neither
power was in any condition to continue. The Venetians had to rebuild their
fleet and the Genoese were, once again, afflicted by civil war. Francesco
Grimaldi, the head of the Guelph faction, had instigated a rebellion against
the Ghibelline rule of the Doria and Spinola families, turning Monaco into a
rebel base. Both sides willingly embraced the peace brokered by Matteo
Visconti, lord of Milan, in which Venice recognized Genoese supremacy over the
Ligurian Riviera and Genoa did the same for Venice in regard to the Adriatic.
The pact was signed in Milan under the auspices of Pope Boniface VIII on 15 May
1299. Marco Polo was released, along with many of his compatriots, in August.

By MSW
Forschungsmitarbeiter Mitch Williamson is a technical writer with an interest in military and naval affairs. He has published articles in Cross & Cockade International and Wartime magazines. He was research associate for the Bio-history Cross in the Sky, a book about Charles ‘Moth’ Eaton’s career, in collaboration with the flier’s son, Dr Charles S. Eaton. He also assisted in picture research for John Burton’s Fortnight of Infamy. Mitch is now publishing on the WWW various specialist websites combined with custom website design work. He enjoys working and supporting his local C3 Church. “Curate and Compile“
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Exit mobile version