Post-WWII Soviet Experimental Heavy AFVs

By MSW Add a Comment 11 Min Read
Post WWII Soviet Experimental Heavy AFVs

A T-10M [at bottom left] showing its losef Stalin parentage. The tank
had a crew of four and the gun mantlet an armour thickness of 250mm (9.8in).
The big rifled D-49T gun had 30 rounds, of which 20 were HE and the remainder
one of three types of antitank round. The size of the rounds meant that the
crew could only achieve a rate of fire of two to three rounds a minute.

In the Allied victory parade British and American officers saw for the
first time the awesome Iosef Stalin IS-3 Shchuka or ‘Pike’. The superbly angled
armour and 122mm (4.8in) gun made it a formidable vehicle. The IS heavy tank
series would develop through the IS-4 and end with the T-10, or IS-8.

Soviet IS-6 Heavy Tank – Plan

Two versions of a prototype WWII Russian tank destroyer
based on the ISU-152 assault gun. The goal was to field an anti-tank gun heavy
enough to deal with the heavier German tanks like the Tiger II, Jagdtiger and
any potentially larger tanks the Russian thought might be in the works with the
Germans. The first prototype ISU-152-1 (Object 246) was developed in April 1944
and mounted the BL-8 long barrel gun. Performance did not meet expectations so
the gun was reworked. In August 1944 a second prototype ISU-152-2 (Object 247)
replaced the BL-8 with the improved and slightly shortened BL-10. It was not
accepted into service because the barrel’s service life was still not what
designers wanted it to be. The penetrating power and accuracy still did not
meet expectations so the gun was again sent back for improvements but the war
ended before this was ever completed.

The Object 704 self propelled gun was a prototype tank
utilising elements both the IS-2 and IS-3 tanks. It was designed to carry the
152.4 mm ML-20SM model 1944 gun-howitzer, with a barrel length of over 4.5
metres (29.6 calibers) and no muzzle brake. It had a maximum range of 13,000
metres. The self-propelled gun carried 20 rounds of two piece (shell and
charge) armour-piercing and high explosive ammunition. The armour-piercing
round, weighing 48.78 kg, had a muzzle velocity of 655 m/s. The rate of fire
was 1-2 round/min. The secondary armament of the fighting vehicle consisted of
two 12.7 x 108 mm DShK machine guns, one anti-aircraft and one co-axial.

In many ways it was superior to the ISU-152 with thicker and
more well angled armour, without sacrificing much in terms of mobility which
was comparable to the ISU-152. In some places, especially the mantlet, the
armour thickness could reach 320mm making it the best protected Soviet Assault
gun of WW2. Built in1945 at the Chelyabinsk Kirovsk Plant. One prototype was
developed of Object 704, which is housed today at the Kubinka Tank Museum in

However, there were numerous issues that came with the tank.
Notice in the picture that the gun lacked a muzzle brake. This noticeably
increased the recoil of the gun. Combined with the sloped armour which reduced
space in the fighting compartment, it significantly complicated the work for
the crew.

This was the primary reason the tank wasn’t used. Although
on paper, the tank looked superior to the ISU-152, it gained those advantages
at the cost of ergonomics.

The Soviet Army continued to develop heavy tanks with even
thicker armour. The most significant of them was the IS-3, which stemmed from
the experience of the 1943 Battle of Kursk. This battle emphasized the
importance of frontal armour and led to the design of the IS-3, which was in
effect an IS-2 but with a ballistically much better-shaped turret and hull
front. The armour of IS-3 was actually 120mm thick at the front of the hull,
but because of the way it was angled it was equivalent to about 330mm against
conventional armour-piercing projectiles, which was more than the armour of any
tank produced before its appearance.

The development of the IS-3 started in 1944 and it was put
into production with remarkable speed at the beginning of 1945. But only a few
were completed by the time the war ended and so none saw any action in it.
Production of it continued until 1959 and totalled 2,311 tanks.

The existence of the IS-3 was revealed to the outside world
when 52 took part in the Allied Victory Parade in Berlin in September 1945.
After the parade Marshal Zhukov, the Soviet commander in Germany, is reported
to have told Stalin that IS-3 made a great impression on Western observers. In
fact, the IS-3 came to be considered the principal threat to Western armies
during the early days of the Cold War, and as `Stalin tanks’ they became
something of a bogey. However, they suffered from various shortcomings
including cracking of the welded joints between their armour plates, some of
which was due to them being rushed into production, and they had to undergo a
number of modifications that went on until the late 1950s. When they were
eventually used in combat, they also proved less formidable than was expected.
This was the case in 1956, when some were destroyed in the streets of Budapest
during the Hungarian uprising, and when the Israeli forces destroyed or
captured 73 of the 100 IS-3s the Egyptian Army employed during the Six Day War
of 1967.

The IS-3 was followed after the Second World War by the
development of other heavy tanks. First came the IS-4, which was also armed
with a 122mm gun but had thicker frontal armour, as a result of which it weighed
60 tonnes compared with the 46.5 tonnes of the IS-3. It was produced from 1947
to 1949 but only about 200 are believed to have been built. Next came the IS-6,
which was essentially an IS-4 but with an electric instead of a mechanical
transmission. It proved a failure. The third tank to be built was the IS-7,
which was armed with a more powerful 130mm gun based on a naval gun. It weighed
68 tonnes, which made it the heaviest tank built in the Soviet Union. Design of
the IS-7 was begun in 1945 and a series of four was completed in 1948, but
after accidents during trials further development of it was abandoned.

There was one more heavy tank that was originally called
IS-8 but which after Stalin’s death in 1953 was re-designated T-10, breaking
the connection of the heavy tanks with the Soviet dictator. In essence, the
T-10 was an improved version of the IS-3, and it was armed with a similar 122mm
gun but it had thicker armour as a result of which it was heavier, weighing 50
tonnes. In 1953 the Soviets introduced into service their last heavy tank, the
T-10 Lenin. The successor to the KV/IS series of World War II heavy tanks, the
T-10 was basically an enlarged IS with a heavier gun and more powerful engine.
It had a stretched hull with a total of seven road wheels. The Lenin weighed
some 114,600 pounds, had a 690- hp engine that provided a maximum speed of 26
mph, and had a crew of four. It mounted a 122mm main gun and three machine
guns, with maximum 270mm armor protection. Expensive to build, heavy, and
difficult to maintain logistically, the T-10 was phased out in the mid-1960s in
favor of the T-62. It equipped a number of Warsaw Pact armies and was exported
to both Egypt and Syria.

It began to be produced in 1950 and continued to be built
until 1957, when it was succeeded by an improved T-10M version that was
produced until 1962. By then the number of T-10 and T-10M that were produced
amounted to about 8,000 tanks.

Four more heavy tanks were developed by 1957, three of them armed with 130mm guns and all weighing between 55 and 60 tonnes. However, none was adopted and further development of heavy tanks was discontinued as a result of a decision taken against it in 1960 by Nikita Krushchev, who came to power in the mid-1950s and who doubted the future of tanks because of the appearance of anti-tank guided missiles.

According to US estimates, the total post-war production of heavy tanks was about 9000 vehicles; about 1000 were IS-3M and IS-4, and the remainder were T-10 and T-10M.

Heavy tanks, from the IS-3 to the T-10 (1959)

Forschungsmitarbeiter Mitch Williamson is a technical writer with an interest in military and naval affairs. He has published articles in Cross & Cockade International and Wartime magazines. He was research associate for the Bio-history Cross in the Sky, a book about Charles ‘Moth’ Eaton’s career, in collaboration with the flier’s son, Dr Charles S. Eaton. He also assisted in picture research for John Burton’s Fortnight of Infamy. Mitch is now publishing on the WWW various specialist websites combined with custom website design work. He enjoys working and supporting his local C3 Church. “Curate and Compile“
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Exit mobile version