The Roman Siege of Carthage: The Third Punic War, 149–146 BC

By MSW Add a Comment 10 Min Read
The Roman Siege of Carthage The Third Punic War 149–146 BC

The conflict is traditionally called the Third Punic War but
the siege of Carthage might be a more accurate name, since there was only one
military operation, the siege of the Punic capital. The Romans had started the
war with Perseus having made him believe that war could be avoided through
negotiations but in fact they were already proceeding in Greece. This strategy
was repeated with Carthage. The Romans began making demands. The consuls that
had arrived in Sicily in 149 with 80,000 infantry, 4,000 cavalry, 50
quinqueremes and 100 hemiolia – fast, two-banked galleys – delivered the
declaration of war in Carthage by messenger. The Carthaginians sent an envoy to
Rome to settle the difficulty by any terms they could. The senate stated that
the freedom and autonomy of Carthage should be preserved and Carthage would
retain its lands in Africa if it handed over to the consuls in Lilybaeum 300
children from the leading families as hostages. The captives were sent and
taken to Rome in a sixteen. Yet the consuls sailed to Utica, which had defected
to them, and set the camp on the Castra Cornelia; the fleet stayed in the
harbour at Utica. The following meetings took place at Utica. Now the consuls
demanded that the Carthaginian arsenal was handed over. It included complete
armour for 200,000 men, innumerable javelins and darts and 2,000 catapults for
throwing pointed missiles and stones. The demand included Carthaginian ships.
When this had been fulfilled, lastly, the Romans demanded that the
Carthaginians must evacuate the city and the citizens settle in countryside
about 20 kilometres inland. Free access to temples and tombs was granted but
the rest of the city was going to be destroyed. The Carthaginians were not
allowed to send an embassy to Rome but the envoys returned to Carthage to
discuss the demands at the senate. Appian’s account tells about the anger and
frustration of the people; envoys were lynched and so were the senators who had
spoken for accepting the Roman demands for hostages and arms. Some Italians who
happened to be in Carthage were also maltreated. The senate declared war on
Rome. Preparations began, as Appian states:

All the sacred places, the temples, and every other
unoccupied space, were turned into workshops, where men and women worked together
day and night without pause, taking their food by turns on a fixed schedule.
Each day they made 100 shields, 300 swords, 1000 missiles for catapults, 500
darts and javelins, and as many catapults as they could. For strings to bend
them the women cut off their hair for want of other fibres.

The Carthaginians had two armies defending their city: one
outside at Nepheris, 25 kilometres south of Carthage, led by the Hasdrubal who
had been defeated by Masinissa, and one in the city, led by another commander
called Hasdrubal. The army outside also arranged for supplies to be sent from
the countryside to Carthage. The consuls began the siege of Carthage but
because of vigorous Carthaginian defence the Romans did not achieve much in 149
or 148. They were defeated in their attempts to overcome the army at Nepheris
and to take Hippo Acra. They attacked Aspis by land and sea and were repulsed.
They made a failed attempt to besiege the city of Hippagreta, located between
Carthage and Utica, because it intercepted the Roman supply ships. In 147,
Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus was elected consul although he was only 38
years old – the minimum age for consulship was 42 – and sent to continue
operations in Africa. He started by returning discipline to the army. The
problems reported by Appian – the idleness and greed of the soldiers resulting
in unauthorized plundering expeditions and quarrels about how the booty should
be shared – were basically the same issues of an idle army that the Romans had
to deal with in the war with Perseus.

Carthage was mostly depending on supplies coming from land
but some supplies by sea also got through because the blockade of the Roman
fleet stationed outside Carthage was not complete. In his depiction of the
situation, Appian describes all the typical difficulties of a sea blockade: the
Romans were not able to keep their positions as they had no shelter and the sea
was full of reefs; they were not able to anchor near the city itself, with the
Carthaginians standing on the walls and the sea pounding on the rocks there.
Some merchants, watching for a strong and favourable wind, spread their sails
and ran the blockade with the Roman galleys unable to pursue them as they
sailed before the wind. Scipio made the soldiers carry out works that would cut
Carthage off from supplies coming from Africa. This caused a shortage of food
in Carthage. He also installed a mole to prevent the entry to the two harbours
that Appian describes as follows:

The harbours had communication with each other, and a common
entrance from the sea seventy feet wide, which could be closed with iron
chains. The first port was for merchant vessels, and here were collected all
kinds of ships’ tackle. Within the second port was an island which, together
with the port itself, was enclosed by high embankments. These embankments were
full of shipyards which had capacity for 220 vessels. Above them were magazines
for their tackle and furniture.

Archaeological excavations have proved the description to be
substantially correct. The Carthaginians began a carefully-hidden operation
from inside the harbour to excavate another entrance at another part of the
harbour in mid-sea. The women and children helped in the digging. At the same
time they built triremes and quinqueremes from old material and launched fifty
triremes and smaller ships from the new entrance. These were defeated, however,
by the Romans in two sea battles outside the harbour, so their last attempt to
take charge of the situation failed. Finally, the Roman troops stormed the city
and started to take it in stages in street fights, starting from the lower city
and ending in the upper. After a week of horror that would be recognizable in
any modern footage covering street fights in the middle of a civilian population,
the surviving citizens were sold for slavery and the city was razed to the
ground. Scipio gave the soldiers a certain number of days for plunder,
preserving the gold, silver and temple gifts. The Romans declared that the city
of Carthage should be left uninhabited and gave the territory of Carthage to
the Uticans as a reward. Scipio celebrated a triumph splendid with gold and
overflowing with the statues and votive offerings that the Carthaginians had
gathered from all parts of the world over many eras; the fruits of their
countless victories. In the following year the Romans celebrated the triumph of
Lucius Mummius from Achaea and Corinth, another helpless city that had been
sacked.

The naval rivalry between Rome and Carthage that started in
the fourth century BC had ceased in 201. Rome had challenged – and beaten – the
Carthaginians, Macedonians and Seleucids in a shipbuilding arms race. In this
competition Carthage fared best, while the Macedonian and Seleucid resources
turned out to be very limited. All these states would have had a chance of
gaining supremacy in the Mediterranean if the Romans had not been involved.
Rome’s success can be explained by good planning, determination to succeed and
a large pool of resources in Italy, including finance, manpower and timber.
Allies played important roles in the conflict. The Romans could not have taken
and kept Sicily without support from Syracuse; the Massilian fleet helped the
Romans on the Spanish coast; and, in the eastern Mediterranean, the Romans benefited
from assistance given by the Aetolians and by Pergamum and Rhodes, gaining
access to ports and advice on the local conditions. None of Rome’s opponents
had similar support from its allies and none of them could draw on resources of
the same scale. As a result, Rome overcame all its enemies in the
Mediterranean, in the west and in the east, and was master of the sea.

By MSW
Forschungsmitarbeiter Mitch Williamson is a technical writer with an interest in military and naval affairs. He has published articles in Cross & Cockade International and Wartime magazines. He was research associate for the Bio-history Cross in the Sky, a book about Charles ‘Moth’ Eaton’s career, in collaboration with the flier’s son, Dr Charles S. Eaton. He also assisted in picture research for John Burton’s Fortnight of Infamy. Mitch is now publishing on the WWW various specialist websites combined with custom website design work. He enjoys working and supporting his local C3 Church. “Curate and Compile“
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Exit mobile version