The First Crusade: The Journey to the East I

By MSW Add a Comment 34 Min Read
The First Crusade The Journey to the East I

December 1096–June 1097

Between August and October 1096 the larger, wealthier, more
disciplined armies embarked eastwards. The anonymous author of the Gesta
Francorum who travelled with Bohemund of Taranto, or based his account on the
memories of those who did, described the process, beginning with Godfrey of
Bouillon’s departure from Lorraine in mid-August, before recounting a rather
fancifully dramatic account of Bohemund’s recruitment to the cause of the Cross
in September.

Our second army came through the Dalmatian lands, and it was
led by Raymond count of St Gilles, and the bishop of Le Puy. The third came by
way of the old Roman road. In this band were Bohemund and Richard of the
Principality, Robert count of Flanders, Robert the Norman, Hugh the Great,
Everard of Puiset, Achard of Montmerle, Isoard of Mouzon and many others. Some
of them came to the port of Brindisi, others to Bari or Otranto. Hugh the Great
and William son of the marquis embarked at Bari and sailed to Durazzo, but the
governor of that place, hearing that warriors of such experience were arriving,
immediately devised a treacherous plan, and he arrested them and sent them
under guard to the emperor at Constantinople, so that they might swear fealty
to him.

After this Duke Godfrey was the first of all our leaders to
reach Constantinople with a great army, and he arrived two days before
Christmas, and encamped outside the city until that wretch of an emperor gave
orders that quarters were to be assigned to him in the suburbs. When the duke
had settled in, he sent his squires out each day, quite confidently, to get
straw and other things necessary for the horses; but, when they thought that
they could go out freely wherever they liked, the wretched Emperor Alexius
ordered his Turcopuli and Patzinaks to attack and kill them. So Baldwin [of
Boulogne], the duke’s brother, hearing of this, lay in ambush, and when he
found the enemy killing his men he attacked them bravely and by God’s help
defeated them. He took sixty prisoners, some of whom he killed and others he presented
to the duke his brother. When the emperor heard of this he was very angry, and
the duke, realising this, led his men out of the suburb and encamped outside
the walls. Late that evening the miserable emperor ordered his men to attack
the duke and the Christian army, but our unconquered leader with his Christian
knights drove back the imperial troops, killing seven men and driving the rest
to the gates of the city. Afterwards he came back to his camp and stayed there
for five days, until he came to an agreement with back the imperial troops,
killing seven men and driving the rest to the gates of the city. Afterwards he
came back to his camp and stayed there for five days, until he came to an
agreement with the emperor, who told him to cross the Hellespont and promised
that he would have as good provision there as he had in Constantinople;
moreover the emperor promised to give alms to the poor so that they could live.

As for Bohemund, that great warrior, he was besieging Amalfi
when he heard that an immense army of Frankish crusaders had arrived, going to
the Holy Sepulchre and ready to fight the pagans. So he began to make careful
enquiries as to the arms they carried, the badge which they wore in Christ’s
pilgrimage and the war-cry which they shouted in battle. He was told, ‘They are
well armed, they wear the badge of Christ’s Cross on their right arm or between
their shoulders, and as a war-cry they shout all together “God’s will, God’s
will, God’s will!” ’ Then Bohemund, inspired by the Holy Ghost, ordered the
most valuable cloak which he had to be cut up forthwith and made into crosses,
and most of the knights who were at the siege began to join him at once, for
they were full of enthusiasm, so that Count Roger was left almost alone, and
when he had gone back to Sicily he grieved and lamented because he had lost his
army. My lord Bohemund went home to his own land and made careful preparations for
setting out on the way to the Holy Sepulchre. Thereafter he crossed the sea
with his army, and with him went Tancred son of the marquis, Richard of the
Principality and Ranulf his brother, Robert of Anse, Herman of Cannes, Robert
of Sourdeval, Robert Fitz-Toustan, Humphrey Fitz-Ralph, Richard son of Count
Ranulf, the count of Russignolo and his brothers, Boel of Chartres, Aubré of
Cagnano and Humphrey of Monte Scaglioso. All these crossed at Bohemund’s
expense, and reached western Macedonia, where they found plenty of corn and
wine and other things to eat, and going down into the valley of Andro-nopolis,
they waited for their men, until all had crossed over. Then Bohemund called a
council to encourage his men, and to warn them all to be courteous and refrain
from plundering that land, which belonged to Christians, and he said that no
one was to take more than sufficed for his food.

Anna Comnena, aged only thirteen at the time, supplied from
the perspective of half a century later a vividly anecdotal and partisan
account of the early arrivals of the western armies in Constantinople in the
winter of 1096–7.

A certain Hugh, brother of the king of France, with all the
pride of a Navatus in his noble birth and wealth and power, as he was about to
leave his native country (ostensibly for a pilgrimage to the Holy Sepulchre)
sent an absurd message to the emperor proposing that he [Hugh] should be given
a magnificent reception: ‘Know, emperor, that I am the king of kings, the
greatest of all beneath the heavens. It is my will that you should meet me on
my arrival and receive me with the pomp and ceremony due to my noble birth.’
When this letter reached Alexius, John the son of Isaac the sebastocrator
happened to be duke of Dyrrhachium, and Nicholas Mavrocatacalon, commander of
the fleet, had anchored his ships at intervals round the harbour there. From
this base he made frequent voyages of reconnaissance to prevent pirate ships
sailing by unnoticed. To these two men the emperor now sent urgent instructions:
the duke was to keep watch by land and sea for Hugh’s arrival and inform
Alexius at once when he came; he was also to receive him with great pomp; the
admiral was exhorted to keep a constant vigil – there must be no relaxation or
negligence whatever. Hugh reached the coast of Lombardy safely and forthwith
despatched envoys to the duke of Dyrrhachium. There were twenty-four of them in
all, armed with breastplates and greaves of gold and accompanied by Count
William the Carpenter and Elias (who had deserted from the emperor at
Thessalonica). They addressed the duke as follows: ‘Be it known to you, duke,
that our Lord Hugh is almost here. He brings with him from Rome the golden
standard of St Peter. Understand, moreover, that he is supreme commander of the
Frankish army. See to it then that he is accorded a reception worthy of his
rank and yourself prepare to meet him.’ While the envoys were delivering this
message, Hugh came down via Rome to Lombardy, as I have said, and set sail for
Illyricum from Bari, but on the crossing he was caught by a tremendous storm.
Most of his ships, with their rowers and marines, were lost. Only one ship, his
own, was thrown up on the coast somewhere between Dyrrhachium and a place
called Pales, and that was half-wrecked. Two coastguards on the look-out for
his arrival found him, saved by a miracle. They called to him, ‘The duke is
anxiously waiting for your coming. He is very eager to see you.’ At once he
asked for a horse and one of them dismounted and gave him his own gladly. When
the duke saw him, saved in this way, and when he had greeted him, he asked
about the voyage and heard of the storm which had wrecked his ships. He
encouraged Hugh with fine promises and entertained him at a magnificent
banquet. After the feasting Hugh was allowed to rest, but he was not granted
complete freedom. John the duke had immediately informed the emperor of the
Frank’s adventures and was now awaiting further instructions. Soon after
receiving the news Alexius sent Butumites to Epidamnus (which we have on
numerous occasions called Dyrrhachium) to escort Hugh, not by the direct route
but on a detour through Philippopolis to the capital. He was afraid of the
armed Celtic hordes coming on behind him. Hugh was welcomed with honour by the
emperor, who soon persuaded him by generous largess and every proof of
friendship to become his liege-man and take the customary oath of the Latins.

This affair was merely the prelude. Barely fifteen days
later Bohemund made the crossing to the coast of Cabalium. Hard on his heels
came Count Richard of the Principate. He too when he reached the Lombardy coast
wanted to cross over to Illyricum. A three-masted pirate vessel of large
tonnage was hired for 6,000 gold staters. She carried two hundred rowers and towed
three reached the Lombardy coast wanted to cross over to Illyricum. A
three-masted pirate vessel of large tonnage was hired for 6,000 gold staters.
She carried two hundred rowers and towed three ship’s boats. Richard did not
make for Avlona, as the other Latin armies had done, but after weighing anchor
changed direction a little and with a favourable wind sailed straight for
Chimara (he was fearful of the Roman fleet). However, in escaping the smoke he
fell into the fire: he avoided the ships lying in wait at different points in
the Lombardy straits but crossed the path of the commander-in-chief of the
whole Roman fleet, Nicholas Mavrocatacalon himself. The latter had heard of
this pirate vessel some time before and had detached biremes, triremes and some
fast cruisers from the main force; with these he moved from his base at Ason to
Cabalium and there took up station. The so-called ‘second count’ was sent with
his own galley (Excussatum to the ordinary seamen) to light a torch when he saw
the rowers loose the stern cables of the enemy ship and throw them into the
sea. Without delay the order was carried out and Nicholas, seeing the signal,
hoisted sail on some of his ships, while others were rowed with oars – they
looked like millipedes – against Richard, who was now at sea. They caught him
before he had sailed three stades from the land, eager to reach the opposite
coast by Epidamnus. He had 1,500 soldiers on board, plus eighty horses
belonging to the nobles. The helmsman, sighting Nicholas, reported to the
Frank: ‘The Syrian fleet is on us. We’re in danger of being killed by dagger
and sword.’ The count at once ordered his men to arm and put up a good fight.
It was midwinter – the day sacred to the memory of Nicholas, greatest of
pontiffs* – but there was a dead calm and the full moon shone more brightly
than in the spring. As the winds had fallen completely the pirate ship could no
longer make progress under sail; it lay becalmed on the sea. At this point in
the history I should like to pay tribute to the exploits of Marianus
[Mavrocatacalon]. He immediately asked the duke of the fleet, his father, for
some of the lighter vessels and then steered straight for Richard’s ship. He
fell upon the prow and tried to board her. The marines soon rushed there when
they saw that he was fully armed for battle, but Marianus, speaking in their
language, told the Latins there was no need for alarm; he urged them not to
fight against fellow Christians. Nevertheless one of them fired a crossbow and
hit his helmet. The arrow drove clean through the top of it without touching a
hair on his head – providence thwarted it. Another arrow was quickly fired at
the count, striking him on the arm; it pierced his shield, bored through his
breastplate of scale-armour and grazed his side. A certain Latin priest who
happened to be standing in the stern with twelve other fighting-men saw what
had occurred and shot several times with his bow at Marianus. Even then
Marianus refused to give up; he fought bravely himself and encouraged his men
to follow his example, so that three times the priest’s comrades had to be
relieved because of wounds or fatigue. The priest, too, although he had been
hit again and again and was covered with streams of blood from his wounds,
still was undaunted. After a bitter contest which went on from evening till the
next midday the Latins yielded much against their will to Marianus, when they
had asked for and obtained an amnesty from him. The warrior-priest, however,
even when the armistice was being arranged, did not cease from fighting. After
emptying his quiver of arrows, he picked up a sling-stone and hurled it at
Marianus, who protected his head with a shield, but that was broken into four
and his helmet was shattered. The blow stunned him; he lost consciousness at
once and for some time lay speechless, just as the famous Hector lay almost at
his last gasp when struck by Ajax’s stone. With difficulty he recovered his
senses, pulled himself together and firing arrows against his enemy wounded him
three times. The polemarch (he was more that than a priest) was far from having
had his fill of battle, although he had exhausted the stones and arrows and was
at a loss what to do and how to defend himself against his adversary. He grew
impatient, on fire with rage, gathering himself for the spring like a wild
animal. He was ready to use whatever came to hand and when he found a sack full
of barley-cakes, he threw them like stones, taking them from the sack. It was
as if he were officiating at some ceremony or service, turning war into the
solemnisation of sacred rites. He picked up one cake, hurled it with all his might
at Marianus’ face and hit him on the cheek. So much for the story of the
priest, the ship and its marines. As for Count Richard, he put himself in the hands
of Marianus, together with his ship and her crew, and thereafter gladly
followed him. When they reached land and were disembarking, the priest kept on
making enquiries about Marianus; he did not know his name, but described him by
the colour of his garments. When at last he found him, he threw his arms round
him and with an embrace boasted, ‘If you had met me on dry land, many of you
would have died at my hands.’ He drew out a large silver cup, worth 130
staters, and as he gave it to Marianus and uttered these words, he died.

It was at this time that Count Godfrey made the crossing
with some other counts and an army of ten thousand horsemen and seventy
thousand infantry. When he reached the capital he quartered his men in the
vicinity of the Propontis [Sea of Marmara], from the bridge nearest the
Cosmidium as far as the church of St Phocas. But when the emperor urged him to
go over to the far side of the Propontis he put off the decision from day to
day; the crossing was deferred with a series of excuses. In fact, of course, he
was waiting for Bohemund and the rest of the counts to arrive. Peter had in the
beginning undertaken his great journey to worship at the Holy Sepulchre, but
the others (and in particular Bohemund) cherished their old grudge against
Alexius and sought a good opportunity to avenge the glorious victory which the
emperor had won at Larissa. They were all of one mind and in order to fulfil
their dream of taking Constantinople they adopted a common policy. I have often
referred to that already: to all appearances they were on pilgrimage to
Jerusalem; in reality they planned to dethrone Alexius and seize the capital.
Unfortunately for them, he was aware of their perfidy, from long experience. He
gave written orders to move the auxiliary forces with their officers from
Athyra to Philea en masse (Philea is a place on the coast of the Black Sea).
They were to lie in wait for envoys from Godfrey on their way to Bohemund and
the other counts coming behind him, or vice versa; all communications were thus
to be intercepted. Meanwhile the following incident took place. Some of the
counts who accompanied Godfrey were invited by the emperor to meet him. He
intended to give them advice:

thus to be intercepted. Meanwhile the following incident
took place. Some of the counts who accompanied Godfrey were invited by the
emperor to meet him. He intended to give them advice: they should urge Godfrey
to take the oath of allegiance. The Latins, however, wasted time with their
usual verbosity and love of long speeches, so that a false rumour reached the
Franks that their counts had been arrested by Alexius. Immediately they marched
in serried ranks on Byzantium [Constantinople], starting with the palaces near
the Silver Lake; they demolished them completely. An assault was also made on
the city walls, not with helepoleis‡ (because they had none), but trusting in
their great numbers they had the effrontery to try to set fire to the gate
below the palace, near the sanctuary of St Nicholas. The vulgar mob of Byzantines,
who were utterly craven, with no experience of war, were not the only ones to
weep and wail and beat their breasts in impotent fear when they saw the Latin
ranks; even more alarmed were the emperor’s loyal adherents. Recalling the
Thursday on which the city was captured, they were afraid that on that day
(because of what had occurred then) vengeance might be taken on them. All the
trained soldiers hurried to the palace in disorder, but the emperor remained
calm: there was no attempt to arm, no buckling on of scaled cuirass, no shield,
no spear in hand, no girding on of his sword. He sat firmly on the imperial
throne, gazing cheerfully on them, encouraging and inspiring the hearts of all
with confidence, while he took counsel with his kinsmen and generals about
future action. In the first place he insisted that no one whatever should leave
the ramparts to attack the Latins, for two reasons: because of the sacred
character of the day (it was the Thursday of Holy Week, the supreme week of the
year, in which the Saviour suffered an ignominious death on behalf of the whole
world); and secondly because he wished to avoid bloodshed between Christians.
On several occasions he sent envoys to the Latins advising them to desist from
such an undertaking. ‘Have reverence,’ he said, ‘for God on this day was
sacrificed for us all, refusing neither the Cross, nor the nails, nor the spear
– proper instruments of punishment for evildoers – to save us. If you must
fight, we too shall be ready, but after the day of the Saviour’s resurrection.’
They, far from listening to his words, rather reinforced their ranks, and so
thick were the showers of their arrows that even one of the emperor’s retinue,
standing near the throne, was struck in the chest. Most of the others ranged on
either side of the emperor, when they saw this, began to withdraw, but he
remained seated and unruffled, comforting them and rebuking them in a gentle
way – to the wonder of all. However, as he saw the Latins brazenly approaching
the walls and rejecting sound advice, he took active steps for the first time.
His son-in-law Nicephorus (my Caesar) was summoned.† He was ordered to pick out
the best fighters, expert archers, and post them on the ramparts; they were to
fire volleys of arrows at the Latins, but without taking aim and mostly
off-target, so as to terrify the enemy by the weight of the attack, but at all
costs to avoid killing them. As I have remarked, he was fearful of desecrating that
day and he wished to prevent fratricide. Other picked men, most of them
carrying bows, but some wielding long spears, he ordered to throw open the gate
of St Romanus and make a show of force with a violent charge against the enemy;
they were to be drawn up in such a way that each lancer had two peltasts

[foot-soldiers]

to protect him on either side. In this formation they would
advance at a walking pace, but send on ahead a few skilled archers to shoot at
the Celts from a distance and alter direction, right or left, from time to
time; when they saw that the space between the two armies had been reduced to a
narrow gap, then the officers were to signal the archers accompanying them to
fire thick volleys of arrows at the horses, not at the riders, and gallop at
full speed against the enemy. The idea was partly to break the full force of
the Celtic attack by wounding their mounts (they would not find it easy to ride
in this condition) and partly (this was more important) to avoid the killing of
Christians. The emperor’s instructions were gladly followed. The gates were
flung open; now the horses were given their head, now reined in. Many Celts
were slain, but few of the Romans on that day were wounded. We will leave them
and return to the Caesar, my lord. Having taken his practised bowmen, he set
them on the towers and fired at the barbarians. Every man had a bow that was
accurate and far-shooting. They were all young, as skilled as Homer’s Teucer in
archery. The Caesar’s bow was truly worthy of Apollo. Unlike the famous Greeks
of Homer he did not ‘pull the bowstring until it touched his breast and draw
back the arrow so that the iron tip was near the bow’; he was making no
demonstration of the hunter’s skill, like them. But like a second Hercules he
shot deadly arrows from deathless bows and hit the target at will. At other times,
when he took part in a shooting contest or in a battle, he never missed his
aim: at whatever part of a man’s body he shot, he invariably and immediately
inflicted a wound there. With such strength did he bend his bow and so swiftly
did he let loose his arrows that even Teucer and the two Ajaxes were not his
equal in archery. Yet, despite his skill, on this occasion he respected the
holiness of the day and kept in mind the emperor’s instructions, so that when
he saw the Franks recklessly and foolishly coming near the walls, protected by
shield and helmet, he bent his bow and put the arrow to the bowstring, but
purposely shot wide, shooting sometimes beyond the target, sometimes falling
short. Although, for the day’s sake, he refrained from shooting straight at the
Latins, yet whenever one of them in his foolhardiness and arrogance not only
fired at the defenders on the ramparts, but seemingly poured forth a volley of
insults in his own language as well, the Caesar did bend his bow. ‘Nor did the
dart fly in vain from his hand,’ but pierced the long shield and cleft its way
through the corselet of mail, so that arm and side were pinned together.
‘Straightway he fell speechless to the ground,’ as the poet says, and a cry
went up to heaven as the Romans cheered their Caesar and the Latins bewailed
their fallen warrior. The battle broke out afresh, their cavalry and our men on
the walls both fighting with courage; it was a grim, dour struggle on both
sides. However, when the emperor threw in his guards, the Latin ranks turned in
flight. On the next day Hugh advised Godfrey to yield to the emperor’s wish,
unless he wanted to learn a second time how experienced a general Alexius was.
He should take an oath, he said, to bear his true allegiance. But Godfrey
rebuked him sternly. ‘You left your own country as a king,’ he said, ‘with all
that wealth and a strong army; now from the heights you’ve brought yourself to
the level of a slave. And then, as if you had won some great success, you come
here and tell me to do the same.’ ‘We ought to have stayed in our own countries
and kept our hands off other peoples’,’ replied Hugh. ‘But since we’ve come
thus far and need the emperor’s protection, no good will come of it unless we
obey his orders.’ Hugh was sent away with nothing achieved. Because of this and
reliable information that the counts coming after Godfrey were already near,
the emperor sent some of his best officers with their troops to advise him once
more, even to compel him to cross the Straits. No sooner were they in sight
when the Latins, without a moment’s hesitation, not even waiting to ask them
what they wanted, launched an attack and began to fight them. In this fierce
engagement many on both sides fell and all the emperor’s men who had attacked
with such recklessness were wounded. As the Romans showed greater spirit the
Latins gave way. Thus Godfrey not long after submitted; he came to the emperor
and swore on oath as he was directed that whatever cities, countries or forts
he might in future subdue, which had in the first place belonged to the Roman
empire, he would hand over to the officer appointed by the emperor for this
very purpose. Having taken the oath he received generous largess, was invited
to share Alexius’ hearth and table, and was entertained at a magnificent
banquet, after which he crossed over to Pelecanum and there pitched camp. The
emperor then gave orders that plentiful supplies should be made available for
his men.

By MSW
Forschungsmitarbeiter Mitch Williamson is a technical writer with an interest in military and naval affairs. He has published articles in Cross & Cockade International and Wartime magazines. He was research associate for the Bio-history Cross in the Sky, a book about Charles ‘Moth’ Eaton’s career, in collaboration with the flier’s son, Dr Charles S. Eaton. He also assisted in picture research for John Burton’s Fortnight of Infamy. Mitch is now publishing on the WWW various specialist websites combined with custom website design work. He enjoys working and supporting his local C3 Church. “Curate and Compile“
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Exit mobile version