Ninth War of
PRINCIPAL COMBATANTS: Catholics vs. Huguenots in France
PRINCIPAL THEATER(S): France
MAJOR ISSUES AND OBJECTIVES: The Protestants in France
sought religious freedom.
OUTCOME: Henry III, although he had returned to the Catholic
faith, issued the Edict of Nantes, which proclaimed religious freedom for
APPROXIMATE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF MEN UNDER ARMS: Catholics,
26,000; Huguenots, 20,000
CASUALTIES: Catholics, 13,550 killed or wounded; Huguenots,
12,040 killed or wounded
TREATIES: Edict of Nantes (1598)
The naming of Henry of Navarre (1553–1610) as successor to
the French throne sparked the final War of Religion between Protestant
Huguenots and Catholics in France. Insisting that Charles, duke de Bourbon
(1566–1612), was the rightful successor to Henry III (1551–89), the Catholics
enlisted the aid of the Spanish. Charles, duke of Mayenne (1554–1611), the
younger brother of Henry of Guise (1555–88), led the Catholic efforts.
At the Battle of Arques on September 21, 1589, Henry of
Navarre (1553–1660) ambushed Mayenne’s army of 24,000 French Catholic and
Spanish soldiers. Having lost 600 men, Mayenne withdrew to Amiens, while the
victorious Navarre, whose casualties numbered 200 killed or wounded, rushed
A Catholic garrison near Paris repulsed Navarre’s advance on
November 1, 1589. Not to be daunted in his quest for the throne, Henry withdrew
but promptly proclaimed himself Henry IV and established a temporary capital at
Henry of Navarre won another important battle at Ivry on
March 14, matching 11,000 troops against Mayenne’s 19,000. Mayenne lost 3,800
killed, whereas Navarre suffered only 500 casualties.
Civil war continued unabated. Between May and August 1590,
Paris was reduced to near starvation during Navarre’s siege of the city.
Maneuvers continued, especially in northern France until May 1592; however, in
July 1593 Henry of Navarre reunited most of the French populace by declaring his
return to the Catholic faith. His army then turned to counter a threat of
invasion by Spain and the French Catholics allied with Mayenne.
On March 21, 1594, Henry of Navarre entered Paris in triumph
and over the next few years battled the invading Spanish: at Fontaine-Française
on June 9, 1596, at Calais on April 9, 1596, and at Amiens on September 17,
1596. No further major campaigns ensued.
On April 13, 1598, Henry of Navarre ended the decades of
violence between the Catholics and the Protestants by issuing the Edict of
Nantes, whereby he granted religious freedom to the Protestants. Then on May 2,
1598, the war with Spain ended with the Treaty of Vervins, whereby Spain
recognized Henry as king of France. The next major conflict between the
Catholics and Protestants in France occurred 27 years later when the
Protestants rose in revolt in 1625 and the English joined their cause in the
ANGLO-FRENCH WAR (1627–1628).
As with any civil war the sudden mustering of large numbers
of infantry means the quality generally drops. There were however, aside from
the Swiss, some excellent infantry out there that was indeed decisive.
First, there was the ‘Spanish’ infantry regiments, composed
of separate nationalities of the Spanish Empire. The Spanish and the Italians
were best, followed by Burgundian and Walloon. It was they that crushed the
Dutch in so many battles and saved their French Catholic allies at others.
The French had their ‘Legion’ infantry from different
quarters of the country. Some were recently raised while others like the Bande
Noire were initially veteran companies of from the late Italian wars who were
excellent. Also, the garrisons of the three bishoprics gained from the Holy Roman
Empire were considered the best soldiers in France.
Even the Huguenots had their crack infantry regiments, like
those under La Noue in Poitou that were long service veterans (by 1570) and could
stand up to the best of the Legions. Navarre’s infantry in the 1580’s were very
tough veterans as they proved at Coutras and later north of the Loire allied to
The Papacy sent some fine infantry to France in 1568 which
were feared because of their discipline and excellent officers, and were in the
thick of the fighting.
Regiments that were long service and well equipped could be
and were decisive (especially in Sieges, of course) on the battlefields of
Dreux, St. Denis, Moncontour and Coutras. There were dozens of less famous (but
fairly large) battles where they took the lead.
Hastily raised regiments were generally of very low quality
and were mostly good for running away. The Huguenots who were pike-and-corslet
poor would strip some units to supply others, leaving them only with staves and
arquebus. They were usually kept far to the rear in battle.
It should be remembered that France fielded the best cavalry
in Europe and therefore had pride of place. Much of the war was financed by the
wealthy and as you can guess they lavished money on their Gendarmes companies
before they took care of the infantry. The crown could afford (on credit) to
keep infantry embodied and armed so they were of better quality.
Infantry played an important part in several battles of the
French wars but this tends to get overlooked due to a focus on the cavalry or a
lack of details in English language descriptions which often rely heavily on
Oman. And Oman used a narrow selection of sources while turning a blind eye to
facts which did not suit him. As a result his battle descriptions are inferior
in detail and quality when compared to those of French or German historians.
The Swiss infantry are rightly famous for their stout resistance in this
battle. Despite all of their supporting troops being overthrown and routed and
the lack of support from the other half of the Royal army they fought on
resisting attacks by both horse and foot. But even though the Landsknechts were
easily beaten by the Swiss they could not stand up to the repeated &
skillfull attacks made by the Huguenot Gendarmes, Reiters and skirmishing
Enfants Predu. With most of the Swiss senior officers killed or wounded and a
good part of the rank & file dead and wounded the mighty Swiss regimental
square broke apart as it was attacked from almost every direction. But the men
did not rout, rather they banded together around individual standards and in
small bands made fighting withdrawal from the field.
During the Duke of Guise’s counterattack the veteran Gascon
infantry play a critical role as they resisted all attacks by the Huguenot
Gendarmes even though they became completely surrounded during the Huguenot
charge. Their resistance tied up a lot of cavalry and eased the pressure
against the rest of the catholic army which was taking a beating from the
combined attack of Gendarmes & Reiters.
Just before that the Spanish infantry had made short work of
the Huguenot foot which forced the Admiral to attack without infantry support.
Without the actions of the Swiss & Gascon infantry it is
probable that the Royalists would have lost the battle of Dreux. Their cavalry
clearly came second best in most of the actions when fighting on their own.
The Swiss again played a very important part in the battle, two regiments took
part. Cléry’s weaker regiment was deployed in the Vanguard with strong support
by French arquebusiers who were posted on each flank. (In order to avoid a
repeat of Dreux where the Swiss lack of arquebusiers meant that they could not effectively
resist the Huguenot Reiters & Enfants Perdu). In the Main Battle Pfyffer’s
regiment was also supported by two ‘regiments’ of French shot, in addition the
cavalry of de Cossé was also tasked with protecting Pfyffer’s flank
In the battle Clery’s regiment engaged the Huguenot
Landsknechts, Segesser describes the ensuing combat as “hard fought and
“for quite some time undecided”. Pfyffer’s regiment remained in
reserve in the beginning but the battle reached a crisis point with the defeat
of Anjou’s cavalry and the death of the Markgraf of Baden Tavannes sent Pfyffer’s
Swiss into battle together de Cossé’s cavalry. The Swiss advanced rapidly
(“at a trott”), an attack against their flank by 1500 Reiters was
defeated by their supporting French arquebusiers and the disordered Reiters
were then routed by Royal cavalry. Meanwhile the Pfyffer’s men smashed into the
cavalry melee at a run and decided it for the Royalists. The Landsknechts who
so far had put up stout resistance was disordered by fleeing Huguenot cavalry
and then broken and massacred by Clery’s Swiss and their supporting troops.
Meanwhile Pfyffer had wheeled his regiment against the right wing of the Huguenot
army and effortlessly broke the resistance of the Huguenot’s infantry.
Arques was very much an infantry battle but since Sully’s account is one of few
easily available in English and he fought with the cavalry the cavalry’s part
of the battle tend to get exaggerated. But it was the Swiss & French
infantry who held the critical fortified positions and without their ability to
resist superior numbers or willingness to counterattack to regain lost
positions Henri IV would have lost the battle.
Battles like Coutras 1587 may not have been decided by the infantry but saw
extensive fighting between the infantrymen on both sides who were anything but
passive spectators. I suspect that a detailed look at the smaller and less well
known battles may well turn up similar details. The only battles in which the
infantry seems to have remained mostly passive seem to be St. Denis 1567 and
Ivry 1590 and even there I suspect that one might find that the infantry saw
more action that is commonly believed if one digs deep into the sources.